Nature vs. Nurture: Do We Have Control Over Our Destiny Or Is It Pre-determined For Us?

Do we have control over our destiny or is it pre-determined for us? This age-old question, which has been pondered since the age of Socrates, continues to cause much bowl over today. Psychologist give favor one side or the other with much feud on the issue. They have been trying to explain or excuse clement deportment in order to have a deeper understanding for study. galore(postnominal) professions have solicited the assistance of psychologists in trying to pre-determine the psychology of potential deal for areas such as employment and placement.The legal profession has sought come in psychologists on both sides to prove their theories of the mental abilities, style explanations or predictions of behavior of a def suppressant or plaintiff. Society has been fighting a regular fight from the debate treasure to record, leaving behind a lean of bewildered brotherly scientist. Yet we still love to phrase everything in terms of one influence or the other, rather than both. (Waal, 1999). In the educational profession, understanding the balance or affect of both reputation and nurture is essential to designing an effective plan for each pupils advancement.Even though, today, it is widely real that the childs culture interacts with his or her genetic traits to determine the kind of adult he or she forget become, it is worth looking at this centuries long debate. The central dispute in the study of clement development is the record-nurture controversy. It is the continuing debate over whether the several(prenominal)s various traits and characteristics are influenced more by inborn factors or by experience. The nurture debate stresses the importance of cultural influences and other aspects of the purlieu that influence human development.Theorists, who share this view, believe that human development put up be controlled by manipulating the surround. The nature debate refers to the idea that biological heredity is the only factor that determines d ifferences among individuals. disposition refers to the traits, capacities, and limitations that each individual genetically acquires from his/her parents. more or less of those traits are physical characteristics, diseases, athletic and intellectual abilities, etc.At the end of the eighteenth century, a debate began about the nature of human beings, the influences of the listen on behavior, and the differences between humans and animals. On one side of the debate were commonwealth who believed that newborn babies were born without any knowledge or skills. washbasin Locke, a British philosopher, suggested in the 1690s that the human infant is like a blank slate, on which experience in the form of human learnedness and it writes messages on the infants unformed mind. This view is known as empiricism.It credits human development to experience. What directs human development is the stimulation pot receive as they are nurtured (Berger, 1988). Several years later, Jean-Jacques Rou sseau argued that children are receptive of discovering how the world operates without adult teaching. He believed that children should be allowed to grow as nature dictates, without guidance or pressure from adults. This view is known as nativist. It argues that peoples heredity is the mold that shapes development (Cranston, 1991).John Watson, the founder of behaviorism, argued that the environment and not nature, was the key to human development. His hypothesis states that most human behavior is learned, or conditioned. In 1918, he began conducting a series of highly debatable experiments with children. The results of these experiments demonstrated that an infant could learn to devotion an object he or she previously perceived to be harmless, and he or she could come to fear similar objects. From his experiments, Watson inferred that children learn everything from skills toNature vs. Nurture 4 fears. Watson showed that childhood larn experiences could have lasting effects in peoples lives (Crain, 2000). In Sigmund Freuds theory, development was the product of both internal urges and international conditions, especially childrens sexual and aggressive urges and how parents handled them. His theory incorporated both nature and nurture. Freud was the founder of Psychoanalysis, a theory that stresses the influence of unconscious motivation and drives on not needed all human behavior (Bee, 2002).In the 1970s, the theory of Jean Piaget dominate the developmental psychology field. Piaget suggested that nature and nurture are inseparable and interactive. His theory states that at each age, people develop schemas. Schemas are general ways of thinking about ideas and objects. According to him, as children actively manipulate and research their surroundings, internal mental images of objects and actions guide them. Experience modifies these schemas. These schemas, in turn, organize historic experiences and provide guidelines for understanding future experienc es.Human development is accomplished by a process of organization and adaptation (Berger, 1988). Erik Ericksons psychosocial theory of human development proposes that individuals are influenced by the interaction of physical characteristics, personal experiences, and social forces. In his view, each culture greatly influences each persons ability to deal with the most significant tasks of psychological development (Crain, 2000). Nowadays, it is accepted in the developmental psychology field that both heredity and environment contribute to human development.The degree to which nature or nurture influences Nature vs. Nurture 5 a persons development varies check to the different characteristics. Although some human characteristics are more influenced by external characteristics and others are more influenced by internal conditions, nature and nurture interact to determine behavior. The environment encourages or discourages the expression of an individuals subjective potential at the same time, genetic characteristics affect an individuals environment. In other words, in terms of human development, nurture and nature complement each other.ReferenceBee, H. (2002). Child and adolescent development (9th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson Custom Publishing. Berger, K. S. (1988). The developing person throught the lifespan (2nd ed.). New York, NY Worth Publishers. Crain, W. (2000). Theories of development Concepts and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Prentice Hall. Cranston, M. (1991). The noble creature Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press. Waal, F.,(1999). The End of Nature versus Nurture. Scientific American. Retrieved March 9, 2005, from http//www.sfu.ca/dant/projects/psyc100/de_waal_nature_nurtute.pdf.