The Ontological Argument Essay -- social issues

The Ontological Argument The Ontological billet is a group of different philosophers arguments for the followence of deity. Ontological literally actor lecture about world and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of beau ideal. The main component of the Ontological argument rouse be found in the Anselms Proslogion which is a short work that tries to license both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in piece the Proslogion is non to directly prove the existence of God but to moreover, to channelize the relationship between faith and reason. Anselm wanted to understand the object of the belief. He is also not trying to defend his belief against the atheist and incomplete is he trying to convince the atheist that God exists. The ontological argument differs from other arguments in favour of God as it is an a priori deductive argument, a priori meaning that can come to a decision by the use of reason and not proof. A deductive argument means tha t if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must(prenominal) be true. Thus, Anselm tends to base his argument on the definitions and terminology used. Anselms first form of the argument is that God is that than which none greater can be conceived. Firstly, it must be emphasised that Anselms definition does not term God to being the greatest but makes it known that postal code greater can be thought than God himself. Therefore, God should not in any way be linked to terms such as omnipotent as terminology such as this limit him to what he really is. With this definition, he attempts to prove that not only does God exist in the mind but also in reality. Anselm uses the event of the fool to prove his point on Gods existence. He says that when the fool says that There is no God in Psalms, he must therefore understand what he hears , and what he understands in his intellect by the term God. Therefore, if he knows what God is, God must exist as it is impossible to know what something is if it does not exist. In chapter three in the Proslogion, Anselm contributes his second form to the argument. This form of the argument is that of necessary existence. He says that that than which can be thought not to exist is not as great as that which cannot be thought not to exist. Therefore, to say that God can be thought not to exist if the definition of God... ...elms first form of the argument and indirectly also demolishes the argument on the necessary existence though his criticism. He criticises and successfully attacks the Cartesian interlingual rendition that in order for there to be a supreme being, existence must be predicate of God (the supreme being). Norman Malcolm then tried to save this argument by coming up with an argument which Davis seems to have demolished successfully. Although the argument does not seem to anticipate too strong in the light of these responses, we can say that although Anselm failed to establish the fool that God existed, he by acquiring more friendship and understanding about the Christian beliefs seems to fortify his faith as a believer. Anselms second form of the argument seems has kept philosophers interested and hypnotized with it throughout time. The very fact that philosophers such as Descartes, Kant, Malcolm have been intrigued by the ontological argument strongly shows that it is a very important and mixed argument which is in favour of the existence of God. Although a final and net answer to the question of Gods existence has yet to be attained, it is still considered to be a remarkable argument.